A person with a disability requests a reasonable modification. Which of the following is NOT considered reasonable?

The installation of an elevator is often considered not reasonable under the Fair Housing Act when it comes to making modifications for individuals with disabilities. This is primarily because elevators can be extremely costly and may not always be feasible, especially in residential settings with limited space or specific structural constraints. While the other options, such as grab bars, ADA-compliant toilets, and ramps, are typically more straightforward to implement and are commonly requested modifications for enhancing accessibility in residential units, the installation of an elevator often falls beyond what is deemed reasonable due to financial and technical factors.

The concept of "reasonable modification" is primarily based on the necessity and practicality of the requested changes, and modifications should also take into account the nature of the residential property. In many cases, modifications should not impose an undue financial burden on the landlord or require extensive structural changes that could significantly alter the property. As such, while the other modifications enhance accessibility effectively without excessive strain on resources, the installation of an elevator is typically viewed as more extreme and impractical in most residential scenarios.